Suzi

Memory, Context & Sessions

Why Claw feels stateful and how its session model affects power-user workflows.

Claw Is Not Stateless

Claw does not behave like a fresh bot on every message.

It keeps continuity through a mix of:

  • Telegram conversation history
  • app-level conversation state
  • a warm per-user runtime when available
  • a Claude session that can be resumed across messages

For power users, that means you can do iterative work instead of rebuilding context every time.

What This Feels Like In Practice

  • follow-up questions can stay compact
  • file-based workflows can continue across messages
  • Claw can keep working in the same operating context instead of starting from zero
  • ongoing reviews of agents, balances, and positions feel more like a session than a support bot
Suzi Claw Telegram thread continuing an active grid bot workflow with order and profit updates.

Important Reality

Claw uses persistent runtime behavior when possible. It is not best described as an "ephemeral sandbox per message."

That matters because:

  • context can carry forward
  • generated files may still matter in later turns
  • the runtime may be resumed instead of recreated

When State Changes

Session continuity is strong, but not absolute.

State can change when:

  • the runtime is recreated
  • the underlying template changes
  • account auth changes require runtime migration
  • an earlier session is no longer available

The right user expectation is: Claw usually feels persistent, but it is still a managed runtime rather than your own always-on shell.

How To Use That

For power users, this changes how you prompt:

  • you can build on prior work
  • you can ask for revisions to generated outputs
  • you can keep a thread focused on one operational task

If you want the user-level knobs on top of this runtime, see Models & Preferences.